Archive for the ‘Industry’ Category

Financial Times Blog Response — Rally shows moral hazard is still alive

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Indeed, the moral hazard still remains and looms over all transactions entering and exiting the markets.  Yet, a key challenge lost to the regulators and politicians resides with a comprehensive restructuring of the markets the banks operate within. 

 

More to the point, if we are concerned with the banks, their risks, and the leverage they assume, it must be holistically examined as part of their business operations – residential mortgages, commercial lending, HELOC’s, securitization, insurance, and so on.  Addressing the macro issues and concerns without fixing the underlying micro models and processes of operation is akin to painting a car that doesn’t run.

 

Each of the aforementioned areas is of great concern for US and UK taxpayers.  With cross-border exchanges and operations the norm for the last two decades, the use of “paper” walls of regulation will do little to address the fundamental causes of the market’s dysfunctional behaviors. 

 

Perhaps it is time to “think big, but start small,” while iterating our markets to success?  After all, we have debated changes since 2008.  What really has been done outside of throwing money at the problems? 

Peering Forward into the Next Decade

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Seasons of Uncertainty Confronts all Aspects of Operations as We Enter 2010

By Mark P. Dangelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

Also published at the National Mortgage Bankers Association

What a rebound in markets and sentiments within a short 14 months – from Chicken Little (“…the sky is falling…”) to Mighty Mouse (“…here I come to save the day…”). Is the worse behind us, or yet to come in 2010?

It was just in July 2008, when the wheels started severely wobbling on the traditional finance and mortgage vehicles, and September 2008, when the axle came off causing a financial “pileup” not seen in nearly 80 years. Very recently, global and domestic central banking measures are being allowed to expire, or in some cases, wound down or withdrawn. Consumer beliefs in a rebound are bottoming out, and in some cases, moving positive once again.

The world is apparently reaching a new, constructive equilibrium, while undergoing a rebirth of social responsibility driven by worldwide wealth shifts – West to East. Sanity and risk-adjusted business practices have reached into all corners of finance and mortgage groups (FMG’s). This change has been not just domestically apparent, but globally, as evidenced by Libor inter-banking lending spreads, which have fallen back to 2007 basis point valuations. Last but not least, global commodity prices (e.g., oil, copper, steel) have stabilized, but they are at the mercy of “weed filled” economies, country agenda’s, and day-trade speculators.

Back in 2006, the Case-Shiller Housing Index reached its highest point with origination values exceeding $3 trillion, but since then, we’ve fallen nearly 40% across both indices. Moreover, the once heralded home ownership percentage has beaten a hasty retreat from over 72% nationally to just over 67% in just over two years.

Additionally, receiving widespread coverage last month was a prediction by Deutsche Bank that the worst may be yet to come – nearly 50% of homeowners will owe more than their homes are worth by 2011. Even more dire are increasing economic predictions of a very long and protracted recovery if not another recessionary dip (e.g., a “W” or double bottom).

Foreclosures are still at historic highs, and our own government very recently has predicted millions of additional foreclosures in 2010. Downward pricing pressures on homes are widespread as federal, state, and local governments supported by servicers try to “modify” the legacy of housing’s irrationality against a shell-shocked consumer. The commercial markets are foretelling an unpleasant nightmare yet to come, and per capita household debt is the highest in history – even after rebasing (not including the U.S. Federal deficit obligation of nearly $700,000 per household).

Nationally, it appears unemployment is going to break or hover near 10% for the foreseeable future, and the investment markets needed for lending might be ahead of the fiscal reality, which is still playing out. We’re happy and encouraged by the “news not being as bad as it has been.” We hope never to see this situation again in our lifetimes. Indeed, we are an optimistic lot.

Most recently, as government officials advertized a 17% return on $70 billion invested. I wonder if during the 2010 mid-term election year, if we will have a touted return on the other $2 to $4 trillion portfolioed in the Fed’s balance sheet and the multitude of Treasury programs?

Or, will it merely be a footnote on the $13 trillion in Federal debt (equaling current U.S. GDP and including $5.5 trillion in Fannie and Freddie guaranteed debt) already clogging the books, and the clouding judgment of foreign creditors? What will FHA add to the mix of woes in the coming years?

So, with trillions in capital equity still to be raised, but currently equaling the market value of all FMG’s (approximately $2 trillion USD), what can be done? Where should business and technology investment’s be made in a Western world still full of uncertainty, record deficits, and a falling dollar?

Are we peering into a West versus East recovery that will produce very, very different economies and consumers as we enter the next decade? Is the shine permanently off the housing apple — to be picked up by new entrants supported by new methods?

As we peer forward on a new decade, there are many stories yet to be written, and many roadmaps in need of navigating.

Bankrupt Macro Ideology

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

There were some very key changes while we slept on the global stage:

 

1.        The UK “AAA” debt outlook was downgraded from stable to negative. 

2.       The Dollar and more important the U.S. ability to finance 15% negative debt to GDP (now < $13.3 trillion GDP projected for 2009 against a growing deficit) is looking more and more risky.

3.       The Canadian SWF’s (Sovereign Wealth Funds) / pensions are also apparently limiting ther buying of Sovereign “paper” from heavily indebted countries (e.g., USA).

4.       The U.S. debt auctions continue to be anemic to poor placing reoccurring pressure on the Fed to purchase its sister agency debt (now estimated to be in excess of 1.5 trillion). 

5.       The growth models that propelled the world markets for the last 25 years are done – the U.S. consumer made Asia and the Middle East SWF’s rich and flowing in trade surpluses and dollars.  The 4th version of global trade has reached its end.

 

I could go on but the potential implications are becoming clear (not facts, not yet):

 

1.       The ability of private industry to finance debt in the second half of this year may come under significant pressure – aka higher costs to borrow if it is available at all.

2.       If Sovereign debt and the ratings of EU developed nations continue to fall, so will the fragile bottoming we are seeing.  Who will buy debt backed by “hope?”

3.       The result might be new corporate costs cutting initiatives across the board regardless of industry. Question is how are they measured and are they enough? 

4.       Anyone recording profits in dollars will experience profit and currency conversion pressures.

5.       M&A’s will be “survival” driven (i.e., little if any premiums), while the credit freeze for medium to small institutions already struggling for funding will drive may to close.

6.       The lack of analytical discipline and rigor will lead many to make uninformed decisions and experience “unintended” consequences

7.       We could be in for a “third” shockwave starting in Q3 2009.

8.       Those dependent on high volume U.S. markets (e.g., outsourcers, manufacturing, B2C, …) will have to radically change their arbitrage business model and strategy or watch others take over their position of dominance.

9.       If unemployment passes 12% (forget the 10% upper control limit), then government intervention may reach a disequilibrium – for globally interconnected economies at these levels we do not have any models or experience with this circumstance (this is beyond the localization of the Great Depression).

10.   Whilst economists want governments and consumers to “spend money” they don’t have there is only so much reality within this tattered dogma. 

 

Much more could be said…if there is such a thing as an “offensive defense” then this should be the approach for many leaders.  Non-conventional revenue growth may be a key to future success.