Archive for the ‘Cloud Computing’ Category

“I am Not the Man I Was”

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Looking Outside of the Comfortable Norm, Seven Pragmatically Determined Projections for 2010

By Mark P. Dangelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

Welcome a new decade – and good riddance to the first decade of a new millennium. With a mix of cautious optimism and somber restraint, we let our feelings of aspirations rejoice that future events will leave an indelible positive mark on our fortunes. Yet, wondering aloud, what is hidden within – behind the veil of positively spun reemerging domestic and global economies. What icy reality is poised to strike fear into recoveries balanced precariously on edge?

Per a recent U.N. economic report, the U.S. economy has very steeply increased its external debt ownership during the last 25 years (to foreign holders) — from near zero in 1986 to nearly $4 trillion. Half of that externally owed debt came within just the last two years. The stark economic realities have created multiple operating threads within the new decade – some with answers, some driving towards convergence.

As servicers, lenders, and vendors the ability to predict the next year is coming into focus – albeit narrow in their definition. However, what the 2010 budgets fail to recognize are the holistic implications of a declining dollar, a three to five year lag of unemployment recovery, and economic risks that are slowly building only to burst our holiday of joy after years of decline. Is this an overly detrimental assessment? No, no, just looking at the data that is already aligned if we care to interpret.

When examining the stark reality and meteoric changes anticipated across numerous third-party simulations, the projections below regrettably resemble the dark and foreboding figure within Charles Dickens A Christmas Story – as I play the unwilling part of the Ghost of Christmas Future.

1. Outsourcing, Offshorer Beware: The premises and value of outsourcing (on or offshore) cannot be denied – although it will surely be debated. Yet, understanding the resulting dynamics of a “100-year” recession. It may be a decade before unemployment decreases to pre-2007 levels. Moreover, it may be (barring any new tribulations) that the Federal deficit will begin only turning positive by 2020 (i.e., we can begin paying it off). Where will the money come from to reeducate the American worker looking at a decade of drift? The new decade will witness increasing implicit nationalism as the new political currency to tax foreign enterprises under the guise of rebuilding the economy. Empathy and balance of operations will be the new form of payment for those enterprises who anticipate regulatory change and consumer sentiments.

2. Regulation – A New Wrapper: Whereas politicians will finally make regulatory changes approaching the mid-term elections, the breadth and meaning of those changes will be far less clear. In an effort to exact a “pound of flesh” to soothe disgruntled voters, they will fail miserably at doing what Henry Paulson, former Treasury Secretary, said needed to be done in 2007 – a regulatory structure that works for the new millennium and for the globally interconnected markets that mortgage and lending products are now participating within. Congress is unwilling to do what must be done, and thus they will extract concessions from those individuals and operations that are believed to have benefited from the now three years of chaos.

3. An Investor Driven World: The “age of origination” has been permanently transformed. As the disposition of the GSE’s is debated, the leadership forces entering the markets are coming from the other side of the globe and the reverse financial supply chain – driven by investors demanding transparency, data, and real-time valuations (see newcomer DelphX launching in 2010). This mantra is quickly spreading as we can implicitly witness from previously benign places such as the IMF, World Bank, BIS, the UN, and even the ASF and project RESTART. The tables have turned on the traditional mortgage operator, as if they want private money to lend and originate, it comes with far greater demands and rules in product forms previously scoffed at by domestic firms. With 60% to 65% of the global liquidity sitting offshore, domestic firms now find themselves in a position not previously experienced in their lifetimes. The driver has become a mere passenger.

4. Our Heads are Firmly in the Clouds: The last five years have witnessed remarkable advancement with new technologies rooted in principles that transcend nearly four decades – cloud computing. As progress goes, cloud computing continues to advance against hyped expectations resulting in layering of innovative technology. However, the measurements and benchmarks needed to direct and evaluate technological approaches are not familiar or even clearly defined. The resulting adaptations will therefore be incrementally iterative in their design and implementation. The capital light structure of cloud computing will continue to offer needed innovation at price points and operating capabilities that will accelerate change while reducing fixed costs. Orchestrated innovation will be the discipline and rigor used in place of once standardized processes. Cloud computing will play a larger and larger role in the management innovation and principles of orchestration.

5. Global Interconnectivity – New Responsibility: For the time being, America has released control of its financial future. Additionally, domestic lending, be it securitized or portfolioed, is now and permanently tied to international finance. The ability of stoic mortgage operations to unilaterally determine their destiny is now firmly in the hand of evolving global regulators, carried international agendas, new investors, and even new establishments being defined outside the influence of old-line monarchs. 2010 will experience a marked rise in new instruments, exchanges, and regulator sanctioned hybrids. Money to fund not only pipelines but improvements will likely face a risk aversion in the first half of 2010 as external events (e.g., stimuli, elections, exchange rates, unemployment, asymmetric recoveries) play out daily on the front pages. A new series of covenants and demands will trickle in from non-traditional players impacting historical processes – which will be cast aside in favor of relevance, financial innovation, and market viability.

6. Back to the Future: Innovation of both business and technology will witness a rebirth of vertical provisioning. For nearly two decades organizations have been shedding operations and outsourcing all “non-core” competencies as a method to cut costs and improve delivery. The expansion of this “fact” has witnessed resistance as small and very large organizations have begun to rebuild their end-to-end verticalization chains. When markets and consumer behaviors are stable, standardization or commoditization of sub-processes cannot be outsourced – at least not in a traditional sense. It is this management reality of the need for increased vertical control that not only drives the use of layered innovations (i.e., cloud computing), but also the methods, models, techniques, and profits that are now demanded by businesses and their customers. Although, verticalization of the past is not the same as what awaits those seeking greater specialization within their delivery value chain today. It is about the assembly of segments in unique and competitively different arrangements that will create longevity – both short and long term.

7. “Unholy” Alliances – A Brave New World: 2010 holds a chance of experiencing a double-dip or retrenching of the pain. While the second blood-letting is not expected to be as deep, the nascent recovery is fragile and in some cases, unsupportable using the very instruments that saved it from destruction. Even President Obama has indicated that this double dip, double bottom might happen in 2010. It will be the resurgence of private firms and proper use of “hot money” that will craft firm relationships between previously disjointed firms. Moreover, as a result of necessity and new rules, former competitors and groups will be forced to make peace and forge alliances across the finance and mortgage markets (FMM). In 2010, the first half will witness several of these public announcements. What you ask? Well no sense giving away the answers to that question – at least not yet.

It is here at the end of all prior things, which shaped the industry as we know it, new beginnings dawns. As the gaunt and thin hand of the future points the way, we must look to Scrooge for our true reality.

Like the story penned over 150 years ago, we must take control of our destiny in new and unique ways – stepwise innovation, technology, process, and yes, people. All assembled in strange and unique ways – some with alliances previously, sometimes arrogantly deemed unnecessary.

In closing, just because the future is anticipated or debated, does not make it a reality. The future makes fools out of those of us who dare conjecture its path. “I am not the man I was” – the same can be said of our industry.

Perhaps our future is best described from a detached and introspective viewpoint.

Beat the heart of industry mortality,

From the ashes raise a cheer,

Our focus is a gauge of simplicity,

Our relevancy is our fear.


UN World Economic Situation and Prospects 2010, Global Outlook, December 2, 2009.

ibid

International Society of Professional Innovation and Management (ISPIM), December 8, 2009, at New York City.

Snapshot - A Survey of Cloud Computing Analytics and Usage

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Taking the pulse of markets and their participants

By Mark P. Dangelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

 

As the end of this decade draws to a close, there has been great talk in the media about the sesquicentennial publishing anniversary of Darwin’s Origin of Species.  Some refer to the “animal spirits” that are contained in the dealers of Wall Street, the industry moguls, and the activists, who are trying to tame an uncooperative world.  However, just like Darwin projections and the science around evolution, a new “technical animal” called cloud computing is changing its genetic structure every day. 

One thing this is very different moving forward with the birth of cloud solutions, is that CIO’s and CTO’s will be measured by business metrics – rather than overhead metrics of cost management and infrastructure spending. 

Additionally, there are two key trends that are rapidly expanding regarding the usage of cloud computing resources and on-going viability – services and “all-in-one” offerings. 

From the survey feedback, the use of services appears to be a key component and concern for many businesses and IT professionals.  Who to trust?  Are they knowledgeable?  What cost and on-going commitment is required? 

Regarding the “all-in-one” offerings, companies are impressed with the idea of a “one-stop-shop,” but are reluctant to embrace an all-or-nothing solution that appears on the surface to be expensive with considerable lock-in periods.  However, with an increasing number of vendors all providing hardware, software and services in an end-to-end bundle, the challenge for purchasers will be evaluating each on their merits efficiently aligned with corporate needs.  Specifically, only purchase what is needed and not pay for unused or unnecessary options.

The survey was constructed to focus on seven distinct areas of interest:

·         Enterprise and Department Usage

·         Belief in Existing Analytics

·         Importance of Existing Data Sources

·         Importance of Existing Analytics

·         Cloud Computing Challenges

·         Cloud Computing Acceptance

·         Cloud Computing Preparedness

Enterprise and Department Usage

Survey results can often confirm what you have expected or in some occasions, produce insights that shed light on emerging trends or organizational beliefs.  This on-going survey was no exception.

When asked if quantitative measurements were important to the enterprise, nearly 60%[1] of the respondents said they were high to critical, yet not quite 50% said they were effective.

Conversely, only 21% of the respondents when asked the same questions about their departments or divisions, said that quantitative measurements were effective, but more than twice as many said that these same ineffective measurements were high to critically important (44%). 

The implications of these results suggest that internal process measurements were not meeting the needs of the local departments / divisions, even though the demand for measurements was moderately high.  Moreover, these same individuals surveyed believed that the enterprise had more effective analytics and that they were almost 150% more effective than their own.

Belief in Existing Analytics

While the respondents firmly indicated that the organization as a whole was better off than their departments or divisions, their belief in the value of their analytical approaches was strong (see Figure 1). 

A deficiency identified with the existing analytics was their ability to provide predictive intelligence – only 14% thought that what they were doing was of high or critical importance. 

The only other challenge potential was the use of analytics to support the delivery of strategic goals or the achievement of operational strategies – 30% identified these as low or NS (not significant). 

Importance of Existing Data Sources

The importance of existing data within the organization for the most part was what analytical specialists would expect.  First, the use of spreadsheets remained a valuable source of analytical intelligence (see Figure 2).  Moreover, point based application systems continued to be the master source for many data analysis and synthesis operations to support extraction of information into the spreadsheets.

This series of questions clearly points to potential conflicts with the use of information and the subsequent manipulation of information by desktop toolsets (and the security, logic, and integrity within them). 

The surprise factor was the 86% moderate to critical importance placed on non-internal or third party data sources for analytical decision.  Clearly, information integration, archiving, and transformation have become a primary need within business and IT departments.

Importance of Existing Analytics

Whereas, current analytics and data sources were given high marks, their importance for various decision making or operational performance were varied (see Figure 3). 

For example, 77% of respondents clearly indicated that analytics for on-going improvements or quality of delivery were of moderate to critical importance.  Yet, only 71% said that the existing data and sources were important for risk analysis and/or mitigation. 

Puzzling was that only 37% who identified analytics as important for revenue or profit improvements given that margins are always measured.  This suggests a disjointed view and potential misuse of analytics across the enterprise.  Meaning, while the departments and divisions focus on exposure and improvements, they failed to see the potential direct correlation to organizational profits.  Striking still was the lack of moderate importance (just 6%) assigned to analytics for regulatory compliance.  The results were very strong (68%) that identified analytics as important for regulatory compliance but a high percentage (25%) indicated that analytics were low or non-significant for meeting regulatory demands. 

Cloud Computing Challenges

While the source and uses of existing analytics yielded a few surprises from the expectations, the introduction of cloud computing and the data sources it generates created some clear challenges (see Figure 4). 

The biggest surprise was the indication by both business and IT professionals that the introduction of cloud computing materially changes the future role of IT – nearly 78%. 

Equally insightful was the 80% of respondents that said the usage of cloud computing increased the risks of meeting regulator needs and agency guidance.

As expected, respondents expected data integration challenges with cloud computing – 29% indicating high to critical issues. 

What was expected, but also telling, was the 42% who said they expected high to critical security issues.  However, equally telling was the 29% who said security challenges within cloud computing were low or non-significant. 

Cloud Computing Acceptance

While the respondents were concerned with the use of cloud computing and meeting regulatory compliance, 50% also felt that it was high to critical in meeting oversight and governance needs (see Figure 5). 

Moreover, 72% believe that cloud computing would be of moderate to critical significance to meet changing consumer and business functionality in the timeframes demanded by the markets.  The respondents also stated that ROI of cloud computing was a major factor in its adoption, but 56% indicated that cloud computing was non-significant or of moderate importance for consumers or customers.

Cloud Computing Preparedness

Finally, the most foreboding measurements regarding cloud computing arrived in the area of organizational preparedness (see Figure 6). 

In every category the ability to perform and deliver on the promises and requirements of cloud computing garnered very substantial non-significant or low ratings.  Many times, this single category gained 50% of the responses.

Regarding the ability to address security challenges, only 17% said that their organization rated high to critical capabilities.

The skills demanded for data integration across the layer of cloud applications received only 24% in the high to critical range.  This alone signified a clear challenge and opportunity surrounding skills, standardization, outsourcing, and correlation of growing data sources provisioned outside the traditional intranets.  

Yet, while there were concerns surrounding data integration abilities, the use and deployment of analytics using cloud computing data sources increased by 3% to 27%.  This margin is not significant but it may point to a greater belief that once the data is properly integrated, the ability to summarize, augment, and transform raw fields will be easier for analytical personnel. 

Finally, when asked a non-specific question on the general cloud computing skill sets internally available, 28% of the respondents believed that their organizations had the necessary high or critical abilities to effectively implement cloud computing – its data, analytics, and security.

Taken separately, each cloud computing skill category performed poorer than the aggregation. 

In Summary

The snapshot of this survey clearly points to a belief that internal analytics apart from cloud computing are established and reasonably trusted.   However, there were clear areas of opportunity regarding their usage and robustness.

Additionally, when cloud computing principles and challenges were introduced, there was a material reduction in the comfort level associated with this rapidly evolving set of integrated technologies.  The most important clearly pointed to data integration and security protection. 

[1] Note, for simplicity of presenting the survey findings in this forum, all numbers were rounded to the nearest integer.


The Six “C’s” of Generating Success

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Success = Components + Collection + Consolidation + Cohesion + Capability + Conclusion

By Mark P. Dangelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

Also published at the National Mortgage Bankers Association

With all the media sound bites and dire messages, sometimes you just want to hide in your cubicle and do nothing new. It is understandable. However, pragmatically we must move forward ensuring that people, processes, and technologies are once again relevant for the decade facing us, and our vastly different operating ecosystems (see, “Peering Forward into the Next Decade”).

So, where should we invest? What technologies or infrastructures should we use? How could we outsource more business and knowledge processes? Should we hire FTE’s or layoff? How do we measure success, and more to the point, is it merely about profits, government conformance, risk mitigation, or social responsibility?

After two brutal years where finance and mortgage groups (FMG’s) have shed hundreds of thousands of quality jobs, will the recovery be a “V,” a “U,” a “L,” or a “W?” Additionally, what will your competitors do? Who are the “desired” consumers? What are your organizational social and community responsibilities?

Indeed, there are many questions all encased by considerable economic uncertainty. Yet, the time for action is now. The time for pervasive technological and process transformations is past due.

So, what is the formula for success as we close out 2009 and peer into 2010? Whereas, no one formula or idea can capture all aspects of viability and the technology needed to deliver quality profits, the following simple framework is able to create desired organizational action.

Success = Components + Collection + Consolidation + Cohesion + Capability + Conclusion

I know, it sounds like a lot. However, let’s briefly explore the six “C’s” of success, and what you might be able to do to capitalize on the operating environment and constraints, which are poised to completely redefine FMG players, processes, and BAU (i.e., competition and intent).

Components, the Sum of the Parts is Greater

Historically, process and technology solutions were frequently viewed as one-offs left to astute and charismatic divisional heads. Technology investments, and the business lines / products they supported, were made against segmented silos of functionality and compartmentalized budgets. As the current decade draws to an undesirable conclusion, the idiosyncratic nature of these sunken ROI projections becomes all too apparent measured against new markets and upstart competitors.

In general, future technologies and co-dependent processes appear to be taking on increased importance outside of the once hallowed walls of IT – that is, “not invented here” personnel have been translated into “no longer work here.” Technology and the capital investments needed for their realization are being created in foreign cities with little geographical familiarity for domestic personnel.

Although, as the component technology pieces are being created elsewhere, the heralded death of internal IT (i.e., the “IT Killer”) by the Cloud, by SaaS, by virtualization, or even by outsourcers, are mere pipedreams.

To be sure, the IT roles of the next decade and dogmatic desires to “control from within” a corporate center are no longer a critical success factor. The roles of CIO’s and CTO’s will increasingly disappear – to be redefined in a new technology world ripe with continuous transformations and multi-faceted governance. With a historical FMG tenure of 5 years and an average salary exceeding $300K, IT leaders will have a lot to justify this next decade.

For internal IT, the ability to rapidly integrate and adapt externally developed and defined components will be greater than traditional technology provisioning. The sum of the parts is rapidly the greatest enabler for the next decade spurred by changing consumer behavior, fast cycle product demands, and competitive reactions requiring collection and cohesion of widely dispersed data sources.

Collection, It is No Longer Just About Money

Collection activities for bankers today have taken on a huge importance. Yet, collection today and tomorrow is frequently more about data than it is mere money. Not just data within a given set of delinquency or workout processes, but data that spans the over 60 distinct functional processes throughout the comprehensive mortgage cycles.

Data collection is just the first aspect of a new decade of new requirements for corporate governance and compliance. The ability to transcend the interlinked processes, both forward and backward, can no longer rely on any manual item, faxed document, or singular “swim lanes.” To achieve proper consolidation and cohesion of increasingly specialized data sources, collection must first accept the challenges of interconnectivity, while preparing for aggregation of compartmentalized data spread throughout siloed applications.

Or more simply, if garbage (inaccessible and non-searchable data sources) is allowed into the value chain of data, it pollutes the entire downstream series of demands needed for risk, decision making, and compliance.

I have to wonder, if we had electronically stored, catalogued, and managed the entire master sources of data for the millions of loans in distress during the last five, would the modifications, legal fees, and political backlash be this pronounced?

Consolidation, the Devil is in the Data

Data. Data. Data. Consequently, if data is everywhere and widely available, why is it that decisions are made that prove inadequate or let’s face it, are out-and-out wrong?

Some would argue that collection challenges are the root of evil when it comes to success driven by sound data (e.g., KPI’s) and decisioning analytics. However, FMG CEO’s ask an important question of why nearly $2 billion annually is spent on power for data center computer equipment? With a compounded yearly increase of data storage now, by some estimates, exceeding 50% annually, what should be contained or consolidated on this equipment that isn’t already there? Where’s the value?

Consolidation of data sources for future success resides with disciplines and technologies that are still not widely in use within the mortgage industry (e.g., master data management, data deduplication, aggregation, augmentation, scrubbing, federations, structured, non-structured, et al). Some of this is cost related and others are more about skill sets and perceived need by executives for investment or action.

Consolidation, within the success formula, is also about the growing third-party portals and data providers along the segmented mortgage processes – fraud, reporting, servicing, investments, hedge funds, FOREX, systems of record, and the list grows with each passing week, and sorry to say, new government program introduced (or withdrawn). Without the first three “C’s” internalized and properly framed, the last three variables in the success formula can lead to money traps and false security.

Cohesion, Leveraging more than IT

Cohesion in this context is defined as “the ability to positively relate various sources of information to each other.” To borrow a term from the pharmaceutical industry, it is about data efficacy. Moreover, driven by new markets and required insights, integrations of the past are not the integrations of the future. In fact, the ability to efficiently and accurately integrate growing and sometimes conflicting data has recently cost many good IT professionals their career and livelihood.

The new decade dawning is already being dominated by new, virtually provisioned infrastructures (e.g., IaaS) supporting fast-cycle business functionality– e.g., Amazon, Sales Force, Microsoft, and Google. As these initial “cloud” identified offerings evolve, their robustness and business criticality takes on new importance across the enterprise. And what do these new layers of infrastructure create spanning processes and business lines? Data. Data. Data.

Therefore, the cohesion of these growing sources increases in importance. The challenge of their integration is not merely an ETL (i.e., extraction, transformation, and load), but a core shift in competencies that was once viewed only from an internal IT need. As systems are provisioned within layers of cloud infrastructures (e.g., data, voice, processes), the skill sets of cohesion and the efficacy it demands are in short supply and represents a job growth area for every IT leader and astute business person.

Capability, Fenced by Risk and Regulation

If we thought the rules of operation were cumbersome and draconian in the past, we may be severely disappointed with the future. In various speeches and interviews, the Executive and Congressional offices are all positioning for changes. Politics and lobbying being what it is, the final regulations may be some time coming – but something will change, especially if this drags into the 2010 election year.

Therefore, as more and more capabilities are delivered via cloud technologies and outsourcing relationships (just look at the numbers, acquisitions, and press releases), organization capabilities will be fenced by how quick we can react to shortened regulation cycles and risk aversion advocates (e.g., Fed, regulators, public sentiments).

Capability moving forward will be still be about systems and technology – but the time needed and patience for “failures” will be drastically shortened. Tolerance to achieve meaningful capability success will be shortened not by mere history, but by decreased CAPEX budgets, time-to-market, consumer products and their profitability, and of course, regulatory compliance.

If we are indeed confronted with a jobless recovery (the “L” or “U” scenario), how much will budgets be increased for new functional capability? What happens if a “W,” or double bottoming, is experienced in 2010? Future success requires new capabilities, but the methods and techniques of defining, provisioning, and bringing on-line will test our operations and vendor partners alike.

Conclusion, Achieving Incremental Reality from Ambiguity

With five of the six “C’s” integrated into the algorithm for success, you might be tempted to think that 83% of the equation is a passing grade. Uh, no. This last variable has proven to be the most difficult to achieve with accuracy and consistency — as it is subject to internal influences and organizational biases of beliefs. The historic methods for conclusions were often more about art than science – hubris over content

Today and more importantly tomorrow, the art of the conclusion or decision is being hurriedly replaced with analytics. Objectivity based upon vetted facts, statistics, and the other five “C’s” is ruling the discussions in the boardrooms and with investors.

In fact, spending on business intelligence tools which support robust decision making continue to increase at double-digit growth rates – an aggregated market that exceeds $60 billion. All-in-one solution sets are being deployed along the entire success equation by industry leaders IBM, Oracle, InfoSys, and SAP.

Achieving “conclusivity” is also supported by a wide range of dashboard offerings (e.g., Visual Mining), analytical and industry specific KPI firms (e.g., Intelli-Mine, Inc.), and vertical benchmarking solutions (e.g., LPS).

Linked together, the six “C’s” are a powerful formula for the changing reality of a new and ambiguous decade. Also it should be noted that the conclusions desired within FMG will no longer be reached in domestic isolation. World governing bodies, global creditors, and wealth rebalancing all will bring a stark new set of consequences for success.

Did I forget to mention the seventh “C?”

* * * * * * * *

In conclusion, successes of tomorrow cannot be redressed on the methods of the past or the behaviors of a few. Continuous vigilance will be demanded to ensure any investment in infrastructure, the cloud, or business processes are exceeding expectations and measures. “Provision and forget” cannot be a path forward for lasting success.

As we move forward, one thing is very understandable – the methods used to measure results in a virtual, highly specialized FMG ecosystem will be distinctive and non-insular. The IT approach to provisioning, integration, and maintenance will also be different. Even the standards of interoperability and exchange will be uncommon – but likely converging.

S-U-C-C-E-S-S. No matter how it is defined, spelled, or framed, success must be generated from within. Are we really prepared across people, processes, technologies, and markets to orchestrate success in an uncertain decade?

In closing, as I get ready to attend my fifth MBA Annual show in San Diego next month, I sincerely wish everyone the best of success during this industry leading event. Make sure you say “howdy!” if you see me.