Archive for the ‘Architecture’ Category

Hocus Pocus?

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008

By Mark P. Dangelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

The struggle or dissonance between what is right and what is easy could be written as the epitaph for the mortgage industry.  However, I’m not prepared to go quietly – how about you?  As our industry begins a rebirth with new ideals and new players, we are confronted with a contemporary set of principles of operations that cannot be ignored and are not necessarily simplistic or intuitive – the ideals of “going green.”

When I listen to the environmental leaders and Noble prize winners, I get passionate.  I want to go tend my garden, plant a bush, convert my home to solar, and even hug that oak tree in the front yard.  Yet, as I look at how the FSI and mortgage industry plans to “go green” I am confused and astounded. 

Like a pilgrim in search of religious awaking, I began to ask questions on my journey to find the magical words or dispel the heresy.  What is the real value chain within a FSI / mortgage green offering and how do all the pieces get assembled into a sustainable series of iterative offerings?  Moreover, is it profitable beyond the seemingly shameless marketing promotion of “green” in an effort to rebrand a non-green product or poor process? 

Hmmm.  I needed to reach out and seek additional guidance. 

I spoke with Cary Burch, founder of Green Score Network and CEO of LSSI, about his views of green FSI and mortgage products.  “I believe there is a growing and necessary call to action for our industry.  For too long our operations were mired in the automation of manual processes.  We claimed success with green initiatives because we had standards, did imaging, and in general promoted ourselves as being ‘e’ compliant.  However, we failed to understand the comprehensive nature of green for our industry and the implications of its adoption.  We touted progress, but we had limited metrics, measures or independent scoring to provide an objective baseline.  As of late, we have become all about data and technology, yet we are repeating the same ‘sins of the past’ without understanding their context and their usage.”

Adding focus and clarity for this column, I need to ask is “green” innovative, or by merely uttering the word “green” the magic happens?   Yet do the ideals of green represented create an Innovative Dissonance™ where the adoption the green innovations require the disassembly and sun-setting of “accepted” operating beliefs?  Is the pain of doing away with the old (e.g., process, relationships, technology, and personnel) too horrible to reconcile in the face of new realities? 

So in the headwind of too many questions, even after talking with personnel within and outside of our industry, I reverted to my comfort zone to avoid my own dissonance – I began to draw.  After several iterations, the result was something I was not intuitively anticipating. 

FSI Green Architecture 

The above model pointed to a “stack” of green cross-sections rooted in ideals that extend well beyond the influence of the mortgage industry.  However, the stack is something we can control and extend into our operations to bear fruit.  The harvest of our planting takes many forms and sizes – ‘e’ solutions, environmental products and services, investor demand, and profitability to name but a few.  Each cross-sectional stack is interrelated and co-dependent upon the ones it touches all the while being influenced by external factors and resistance to change.  The model, like the tree it represents, was meant to grow and change as part of a circle of renewal (e.g., see symbolism of the sun in the sky, the hawk, and the mouse, et al).

I showed Mr. Burch my model.  He responded, “Our historical discussions on green were excellent starting points for the industry.  We need to move beyond those embryonic ideals and recognize the growing complexity as we expand from these disjointed efforts into a series of streamlined green processes that promote environmental and operational success.  I foresee a growing base of ideals that help organizations assess, rate, and improve their ‘green score’ over a period of time.  If we recognize and embrace a comprehensive value chain of green ideals, we can achieve not only benefit for the environment, but also for sustainable bottom line results, investors, and yes, our customers.  How we react as an industry and individual organizations will determine our operational survivability.”

All these discussions caused me to pause and reflect — “Most people are on the world, not in it - have no conscious sympathy or relationship to anything about them - undiffused, separate, and rigidly alone like marbles of polished stone, touching but separate.”  When John Muir, the founder of the Sierra Club, made this statement in 1873, he could have never thought how true his words would resonate over the next 135 years.  However, as we eagerly and necessarily embrace green ideals and operating principles within the FSI / mortgage industry, we must come to grips with what is marketing, what is easy, and indeed what is a necessity as part of the expanding “green” value proposition. 

Here’s an interesting question as we mull over the future of green — out of the $24.3 trillion USD in outstanding household and small business debt, how much of it is related to “green” investments, products, assets, and securitizations?  What percentage will be green in five years and how much of its market share will you influence?  Will you be a player at all?

If you are looking for a different POV and the input from other industry leaders I spoke with during this last week, seek out my other article entitled “Green Identity.”

Consumer Mining

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Stagflation, recession, loss of workforces, commodity hyper-appreciation, and market correction has transformed mortgage end-to-end operational foci from throughput to customer identification and qualification – all within a short 12 months.  Inside every facet of our business models and technological infrastructures, we struggle with were to find and retain profitable consumers.  No individual professional or mortgage operation is immune.  No financial results or staffing ranks unaffected.  Resembling a Greek Tragedy, with a Shakespearian twist, we beat our breasts and lament “Consumer, consumer, where for art though?”  Perhaps they have gone with the nearly 11 million households that possess negative equity, the nearly 11 month supply of homes for sale, or the 8.8% of homes in foreclosure and delinquency?  

So what do we do?  The technical architectures and ideals for todays loosely coupled customer data integration (CDI), MDM, CRM, et al had their genesis back in the early 1990’s as computer scientists began to move beyond transactional processing into multi-system interoperability.  Spurred by noted visionaries (e.g., Shaku Atre, John Zachman) and industry powerhouses (e.g., IBM, Hogan) this fledgling specialization concentrated on house-holding, cross-selling and enterprise data management using internal and third-party data stores. 

Fast-forward nearly two decades and we have begun to deploy new, compartmentalized technological solutions that address fraud, MDM segregation, internet SaaS widgets, n-cube management, collection agents, and complex predictive modeling.  All highly specialized and until recently, not well understood.  For many mortgage operations, these were left to the “geeks” and mathematicians in the backroom to devise.  They were classified as “valuable,” but until recently we were not quite sure why. 

Specialized intelligence (e.g., business, consumer, competitive, and financial) operations have now repeatedly sprang up in those dark corners of our operations.  Surrounded by terabytes of structured and unstructured data elements, these specialized initiatives sought to identify who was “the consumer” and why they “bought” products and services.  Moreover, what is THE algorithm or profiles that definitively lead to customer profitability, successful channel outreach, loan remediation, and growth potential?  The crisis has brought sanity to these arcane discussions and a hope that we can and will achieve a sustainable set of integrated customer mining solutions with both internal and external informational sources.

However, while noted vendors are introducing new solutions to cope and combat changing consumer dynamics (e.g., XSell, The Turning Point), we need to ask ourselves if we have a cohesive consumer architecture that can properly leverage and adapt these various, interconnected solution sets.  This includes not only e-processing but risk mitigation, “cross-holding,” retention, targeting, and on-going consumer behavioral assessment. 

I must ask, are we playing a game of “consumer Whac-a-Mole” with our approach to solve complex customer problems, without understanding the life-cycle and interoperability demands within the existing and future infrastructure?  What about the regulatory, compliance, security, and privacy demands that are shifting fast, driven by negative public ratings surrounding our industry?  How do the pieces fit together to avoid failure and excessive costs?

The use of innovation and innovative methods and techniques permeate the industry’s existing and announced customer and risk management solutions.  We now have meaningful and valuable vendor offerings that work today.  Yet, we have “players in our game” that are trying to target that consumer when and where they resurface – we’re reacting more than predicting. 

This cerebral shift will result in some fundamental organization changes along with internal accountability – marketing, consumer advocacy, master data management, compliance, community affairs, and even the Hope Now Alliance to name but a few.  We must become orchestrators of tech innovation in cooperation with associations, activists, and our vendors.  Our ability to perform multi-dimensional, data integration has advanced considerably.  How are we prepared to utilize it efficiently and competitively?

I have one last rhetorical question.  As we deploy and utilize customer technologies how will they be received by these prospects we so eagerly seek?  As we suffer the worst crisis of confidence since the Great Depression, we need to remember that these solutions can “cut both ways” – intentionally or unintentionally. 

In closing, I would encourage organizations and vendors to comment about your experiences — what has worked, what challenges must be overcome, and what are the on-going governance and oversight needs that to be established for sustainability.